[ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 7.6 released!
Eli Zaretskii
eliz@gnu.org
Mon May 6 16:19:00 GMT 2013
> Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 14:32:03 +0400
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> > While according to the GDB rules the throw_perror_with_name function
> > could be removed now (merged back into perror_with_name) I do not find
> > it completely right, throw_perror_with_name is a logical part in the
> > whole error reporting set and it is only coincidence it has currently
> > no users.
>
> I had a feeling that we'd feel that way. No problem with that on my end.
So is it OK to include exceptions.h in utils.h?
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list