Simulator dv-sockser.o patch testing

Joel Sherrill joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com
Tue Mar 26 17:12:00 GMT 2013


On 3/25/2013 10:22 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> That is, it's the only sim where the default config is "no": "no
>> hardware enabled by default".  If that number *decreases* due to
>> a patch supposed to *enable* things, the patch seems wrong.
> Oops: it's the number of *untested* cases that decrease when
> enabling default-disabled hardware (yes, I do test and account
> for that in the test-suite)... *blush*
>
> So ignore my previous post while I remove my foot from my mouth.
It is really complicated and a lot of details. No apology needed. :)

Does Mike's patch look ok based upon my testing?

If so, he has some committing to do. :)
> brgds, H-P


-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list