RFC: fix PR 12707
Pedro Alves
palves@redhat.com
Tue Jan 15 15:12:00 GMT 2013
No comments on the patch itself.
On 01/14/2013 07:31 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> # A list of minimal symbol names to check.
> -# Note that GDB<char>::even_harder<int>(char) is quoted and includes
> -# the return type. This is necessary because this is the demangled name
> -# of the minimal symbol.
> +# Note that GDB<char>::even_harder<int>(char) is quoted.
This caught my eye though. Is there still a reason for the quoting?
(I don't think I understood the original comment's reasoning
fully either.)
> set min_syms [list \
> "GDB<int>::operator ==" \
> "GDB<int>::operator==(GDB<int> const&)" \
> "GDB<char>::harder(char)" \
> "GDB<int>::harder(int)" \
> - {"int GDB<char>::even_harder<int>(char)"} \
> + {"GDB<char>::even_harder<int>(char)"} \
> "GDB<int>::simple()"]
--
Pedro Alves
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list