[PATCH] Fix mi "-var-create" regression

Luis Machado lgustavo@codesourcery.com
Fri Nov 16 02:10:00 GMT 2012


On 11/15/2012 10:50 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
> I think it would be faster if you took care of it.
>
> Much appreciated!
>
> (sorry for the top-post)
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Luis Machado<lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
> To: Marc Khouzam<marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
> Cc: 'Tom Tromey'<tromey@redhat.com>, 'Joel Brobecker'<brobecker@adacore.com>, "'lgustavo@codesourcery.com'"<lgustavo@codesourcery.com>, "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'"<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Sent: 15-11-2012 18:28
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mi "-var-create" regression
>
>
>
> On 11/15/2012 06:54 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tom Tromey [mailto:tromey@redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:47 PM
>>> To: Joel Brobecker
>>> Cc: Marc Khouzam; 'lgustavo@codesourcery.com';
>>> 'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mi "-var-create" regression
>>>
>>>>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker<brobecker@adacore.com>   writes:
>>>
>>> Joel>   I haven't looked at the patch itself, but at this
>>> point, we really
>>> Joel>   want any of them to be extra safe. If the approver
>>> thinks so, then
>>> Joel>   it can go in.
>>>
>>> I think it would be fine.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> So how does it work?  Luis, are you ok to check it in to 7_5
>> yourself or should I do it (am I even allowed to do that?)
>
> Either option is fine with me. If you want, i can check it in.
>
> Regards,
> Luis

Done.

Attached is what i checked in.

Regards,
Luis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rtti-print-object.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3914 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20121116/e2584ac8/attachment.bin>


More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list