[RFA take 6] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:10:02 +0000
> From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
> Cc: dje@google.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
>         mark@klomp.org
> 
> > > "Do not reject possibly inconsistent .gdb_index sections."
> > 
> > The meaning of that is that the sections being skipped are
> > inconsistent within themselves.  If that's really what you meant,
> > I'm fine with the change.
> 
> The issue is that with older index section the information in the
> .gdb_index sections is not consistent with the information that GDB
> would generate from the DWARF.

Why does this happen?  Is the information in those sections
inaccurate?