[PATCH] Makefile.in includes linux-record.c to be common for all arch. (arm-reversible>phase-3)

[oza Pawandeep]

Yes I agree; as I integrated both of them and post them at once.
sorry about confusion; this patch has to be ignored.

In fact I wanted this patch to be approved first because without which
sys call patch would not compile.

Regards,
Oza.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 06/18/2012 05:08 PM, oza Pawandeep wrote:
>> diff -urN orig/configure.tgt new/configure.tgt
>> --- orig/configure.tgt        2012-06-18 12:36:47.274501400 +0530
>> +++ new/configure.tgt 2012-06-18 12:31:47.335501400 +0530
>> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
>>  arm*-*-linux*)
>>       # Target: ARM based machine running GNU/Linux
>>       gdb_target_obs="arm-tdep.o arm-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \
>> -                     solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o"
>> +                     solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o linux-record.o"
>>       build_gdbserver=yes
>>       ;;
>>  arm*-*-netbsd* | arm*-*-knetbsd*-gnu)
>>
>> ok to check in ?
>
> It is not good to post the same change twice in different mails.  This
> change makes no sense until your 'arm-syscall record' patch is approved.
>  I noticed that this change has been included in your 'arm-syscall
> record' patch, so I think patch here doesn't have to reviewed.
>
> --
> Yao (齐尧)
>
>