[RFA] Updated path expression computations for varobj trees
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Thu Jan 12 21:30:00 GMT 2012
>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> writes:
Keith> In other words, we assume that the construct is a compound type unless
Keith> the child's name begins with "*", which means the parent must be a
Keith> pointer.
Keith> We may encounter difficulties with this, too, mind you, but I believe
Keith> this is a cheaper and easier condition to deal with than the regexp.
Me too.
If the issue is typedefs, we also have the option of requiring a certain
naming convention for code using this part of the test suite.
Keith> What do you think?
It is fine by me.
Tom
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list