Make the "python" command resemble the standard Python interpreter
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Wed Jan 11 20:56:00 GMT 2012
>>>>> "Yit" == Khoo Yit Phang <khooyp@cs.umd.edu> writes:
Yit> I'd like to contribute a patch to improve the "python" command by
Yit> making it resemble the standard Python interpreter in behavior.
Thanks.
Do you have a copyright assignment in place?
If not, contact me off-list and I will get you started.
We need this before we can incorporate this patch.
Yit> For "python" with arguments, this prints the results of expressions,
Yit> e.g., "python 1 + 2" will print "3" (previously, it will not print
Yit> anything).
Did you run the test suite? I'm curious if this caused any failures.
On balance, I'm ok with this idea, since I don't think we make many
promises about CLI output remaining the same across versions.
Yit> For "python" without arguments, this uses Python's built-in
Yit> interactive loop (PyRun_InteractiveLoop) so that individual
Yit> statements/expressions are immediately evaluated and results of
Yit> expressions are printed.
Sounds nice.
This also seems like it could cause some (spurious) test failures.
Yit> It also hooks GDB's readline wrappers
Yit> (command_line_input) to Python so that line editing and history
Yit> editing works. Additionally, Python's standard readline module is
Yit> stubbed out because it conflicts with GDB's use of readline.
Can you expand more on how it conflicts?
I think it would be better to make it not conflict somehow.
Yit> + TRY_CATCH (except, RETURN_MASK_ALL)
Yit> + {
Yit> + struct cleanup *cleanup = gdbpy_suspend_sigint_handler ();
Yit> + p = command_line_input (prompt, 0, "python");
Yit> + do_cleanups (cleanup);
Yit> + }
Yit> +
Yit> + /* Detect Ctrl-C and treat as KeyboardInterrupt. */
Yit> + if (except.reason == RETURN_QUIT)
Yit> + return NULL;
Does this case need the Python exception to be set? If not, I think it
would be good to expand this comment to explain the situation.
Yit> + m = PyImport_AddModule ("__main__");
Yit> + if (m == NULL)
Yit> + error (_("Error while executing Python code."));
You have to do something with the Python exception here.
Usually we use gdbpy_print_stack, but sometimes other things are
appropriate.
Yit> + d = PyModule_GetDict (m);
Do we need error checking?
I didn't look at the API docs.
Yit> + v = PyRun_StringFlags (command,
Yit> + from_tty ? Py_single_input : Py_file_input,
Yit> + d, d, NULL);
Yit> + if (v == NULL)
Yit> + {
Yit> + int interrupt = PyErr_ExceptionMatches (PyExc_KeyboardInterrupt);
Yit> + PyErr_Print ();
gdbpy_print_stack.
Yit> + if (! interrupt)
Yit> + error (_("Error while executing Python code."));
Why the special case for interrupts here?
Tom
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list