[patch 0/3] readline-6.2 rebase

[Jan Kratochvil]

On Wed, 11 May 2011 18:36:23 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I'm sensitive to the 'git bisect' argument, and I think that it's easy
> to recreate the local diff. Also, I think we've always submitted the
> vast majority of changes we make to readline, so of the changes should
> no longer be needed at the next update. So a single-commit would be
> my prefered option.

OK, I will go with this single-commit way.


> But I don't have a strong opinion. A multi-commit would be fine as well.
> Or we could cut the cake in the middle, and make 2 commits: one resetting
> readline with no change, and then one commit with all our local changes.

TBH the two-commit way seems to me to have only disadvantages of both ways.


Thanks,
Jan