[patch] Add missing call to restore_child_signals_mask.

[Pedro Alves]

On Tuesday 03 May 2011 04:21:13, Doug Evans wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Perhaps there's an obscure reason why this patch is wrong,
> but I can't think of one.

Neither can I.  No objections, thanks.

> [The function calls block_child_signals at the start - all exit
> paths should, presumably, call restore_child_signals_mask before returning.]
> 
> I will check it in in a few days if there are no objections.
> 
> 2011-05-02  Doug Evans  <dje@google.com>
> 
> 	* linux-nat.c (lin_lwp_attach_lwp): For !WIPSTOPPED case,
> 	adding missing call to restore_child_signals_mask.
> 
> Index: linux-nat.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/linux-nat.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.202
> diff -u -p -r1.202 linux-nat.c
> --- linux-nat.c	29 Apr 2011 15:54:12 -0000	1.202
> +++ linux-nat.c	3 May 2011 03:17:33 -0000
> @@ -1476,7 +1476,10 @@ lin_lwp_attach_lwp (ptid_t ptid)
>  
>        status = linux_nat_post_attach_wait (ptid, 0, &cloned, &signalled);
>        if (!WIFSTOPPED (status))
> -	return -1;
> +	{
> +	  restore_child_signals_mask (&prev_mask);
> +	  return -1;
> +	}
>  
>        lp = add_lwp (ptid);
>        lp->stopped = 1;
> 

-- 
Pedro Alves