RFC: partially available registers

[Pedro Alves]

On Sunday 17 July 2011 21:26:17, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> >
> > Daniel> As for the patch itself:
> > Daniel> * Some documentation on the gdbarch method would be nice, in
> > Daniel> particular, the return value.  Does 0 mean "not a pseudo"?
> >
> > Yeah, I left that out for the initial change, but I think I shouldn't
> > have.
> >
> > I find gdbarch.sh very hard to read.  Does anybody else?
> 
> Incredibly.  Someone please flip us to C++ and use a normal construct
> for this...

Hey, gcc flipped this week.  We're running behind already.  :-)

-- 
Pedro Alves