segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running?
Marc Khouzam
marc.khouzam@ericsson.com
Thu Jan 6 18:57:00 GMT 2011
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Brobecker [mailto:brobecker@adacore.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 11:38 PM
> To: Marc Khouzam
> Cc: 'Pedro Alves'; 'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'; 'Tom Tromey'
> Subject: Re: segfault: what should happen when I remove an
> inferior that is running?
>
> > Just a small nit that the ARI script discovered, we forgot the i18n
> > marker:
> >
> > error (_("cannot remore an active inferior"));
> >
> > (I also think that the proper spelling is `cannot' rather than
> > 'can not' - confirmed by wikipedia, even though they say that it is
> > occasionally spelled as two words)
> >
> > Would you mind making the obvious fix?
>
> Looks like Mark is away from the office, so I checked in the attached
> fix (HEAD & 7.2 branch)
Thanks Joel!
So I know for next time, when should this i18n marker be used?
Should it be used for any user-visible string output?
There are other instances of error() being called without it
from mi-main.c.
> \grep error\ \( mi-main.c | \grep -v error\ \(_ | wc -l
38
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list