[RFA] info break/watch/trace use get_number_or_range, take two

[Michael Snyder]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
>> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:16:51 +0000
>> Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
>>
>>>    add_info ("breakpoints", breakpoints_info, _("\
>>> -Status of user-settable breakpoints, or breakpoint number NUMBER.\n\
>>> +Status of user-settable breakpoints listed, or all breakpoints if no argument.\n\
>> "listed" doesn't sound obviously referring to the spec
>> you pass as argument to the command.  "listed where?  the
>> command itself is printing a list." was my thought.  Is
>> there any other way to spell that?
> 
> How about just losing the "listed" part?  What important information
> does it convey in this context?

What wording do you suggest?