[RFC] Add support for .debug_gdb_scripts to mach-o.
Doug Evans
dje@google.com
Wed Dec 28 00:35:00 GMT 2011
Hi.
I have no means of testing this.
And it's not clear that adding .debug_gdb_scripts to dwarf_section_names_xlat
is reasonable.
Can anyone using mach-o test this, or suggest a better fix?
There is a testcase for .debug_gdb_scripts in
gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-section-script.exp
but I'm not sure it'll work as is on mach-o.
TIA
2011-12-27 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* mach-o.c (dwarf_section_names_xlat): Add .debug_gdb_scripts.
Index: mach-o.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/mach-o.c,v
retrieving revision 1.81
diff -u -p -r1.81 mach-o.c
--- mach-o.c 19 Dec 2011 15:42:36 -0000 1.81
+++ mach-o.c 28 Dec 2011 00:15:14 -0000
@@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ static const mach_o_section_name_xlat dw
{ ".debug_macro", "__debug_macro",
SEC_DEBUGGING, BFD_MACH_O_S_REGULAR,
BFD_MACH_O_S_ATTR_DEBUG, 0},
+ { ".debug_gdb_scripts", "__debug_gdb_scr",
+ SEC_DEBUGGING, BFD_MACH_O_S_REGULAR,
+ BFD_MACH_O_S_ATTR_DEBUG, 0},
{ NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0}
};
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list