[PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode

[Jan Kratochvil]

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:30:25 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> so it seems there's no point in trying to retain all the other
> bits of DR_STATUS.

I agree and I agree with this patch part.

(I do not agree for example with the lwp->stopped_by_watchpoint part as
multiple watchpoints may get hit on one stop which isn't handled well but that
is out of the scope of this discussion.)


Thanks,
Jan