[RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet

[pfee@talk21.com]

> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 03:48:51 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:

> > Sometimes I want  to run with scheduler-locking on, but having to turn it 
on,
> > perform the  command, and remember to turn it off afterwards is annoying.
> 
> Please no,  Fedora already has default `set scheduler-locking step' because
> this is what  the users expect from the stepping commands.
> 
> What are the reasons for not  using `set scheduler-locking step'?
> 

I like the 'step' mode of scheduler-locking, but often wish it applied to the 
"next" command, not just step.

My suggestion would be to create a "set scheduler-locking next" mode in which 
both "step" and "next" operate with other threads locked out.

Thanks,
Paul