[PATCH 1/7] Introduce header (jit-reader.h.in) and modify build system.

Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
Sat Aug 20 17:17:00 GMT 2011


On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:39:11 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I understand that jit.c will be compiled unconditionally on the x86
> architectures, is that right?  If so, would it be possible to rename
> jit-header.h.in to jit-header.in, or some other name that doesn't
> violate the file-naming restrictions on 8+3 (a.k.a. DOS) filesystems?

Do you have some recent successful build of DJGPP on such 8+3 platform?
jit-header.h.in is the only right name to substitute for jit-header.h so it
would make sense to break the naming for some real portability.  But the last
statement from you
	Re: [RFC] DJGPP: fnchange.lst removal attempt
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00389.html

said the last build you done was gdb-7.0 and I was not successful myself on
FreeDOS in that mail thread.


Thanks,
Jan



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list