[PATCH 4/6] Implement support for SystemTap probes

[Sergio Durigan Junior]

fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:

> Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> print $_probe_arg0 == x
>> Cannot evaluate expression `112(31)'.
>> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/stap-probe.exp: check $_probe_arg0, with semaphore
>
> That should work, "112(31)" means offset 112 from the address in register 31.

Yes, it's actually a problem with the parser on stap-probe.c.  I'm
fixing this right now.