[RFA 5/8] New port: TI C6x: gdb port

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, Pedro Alves wrote:

> Seems like there are a lot of non-core registers here.  Now that
> the gdbserver patch has been updated to send in standard tic6x xml
> register description features, all registers the target includes in the
> description that are not part of the defined features should not need
> to be hardcoded in gdb, since the xml description itself will describe
> their sizes and names.  See arm-tdep.c:arm_register_name for example.
> More comments on this further down.

Won't GDB need a list of how the register names correspond to DWARF 
register numbers (which are allocated for all these registers) somewhere?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com