[patch] Workaround buggy GCC PR 47510 produced code

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> The proposed patch could make false warnings if any code out there
Jan> has DW_TAG_typedef with children, it does not check for specific
Jan> GCC versions.  Still such DWARF is invalid, although in such case
Jan> complaint() would be more appropriate than warning().  Does it make
Jan> sense to differentiate it?

If there is no specific reason to use warning, I think you should use
complaint.

Tom