[PATCH,ARM] Fix single step on vfork

[Pedro Alves]

On Thursday 02 September 2010 02:03:53, Yao Qi wrote:
> Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 September 2010 17:56:32, Yao Qi wrote:
> >> +  /* Don't consider single-stepping when the inferior is 
> >> +     waiting_for_vfork_done, either software or hardware step.  In
> >> +     software step, child process will hit the software single step
> >> +     breakpoint inserted in parent process.  In hardware step, GDB
> >> +     can resumes inferior, and waiting for vfork_done event.  */
> > 
> > This last sentence looks incomplete?  At least, I can't seem to
> > parse it.
> > 
> I replaced "waiting" by "wait" in the new patch.

Thanks.  Please go ahead with your patch.  Hope you don't mind I tweak
the comment a bit afterwards.

-- 
Pedro Alves