Regression on gdb.ada/null_array.exp [Re: [patch] DW_AT_byte_size for array type entries]

[Jan Kratochvil]

On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:00:47 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I don't think we can restore the original (lucky) behavior without
> breaking the intent of Ken's patch.

OK, so could you XFAIL it? <=gcc-4.4 or the missing ___XA type are both fine
IMO.  I will do it otherwise.


> > BTW local FSF GCC 4.4.x rebuild should also make it IMO reproducible.
> 
> Do the most recent compilers trigger the regresions as well?

No.

On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:09:35 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
# This patch has a regression, for:
#       gcc (GCC) 4.4.6 20101103 (prerelease)
# 
# The regression does not happen with:
#       gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20101103 (experimental)
#       gcc (GCC) 4.5.2 20101103 (prerelease)


Thanks,
Jan