[resubmit] gdb.base, r*.exp thru w*.exp
Michael Snyder
msnyder@vmware.com
Thu May 20 21:46:00 GMT 2010
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 22:29:47 +0200, Michael Snyder wrote:
>> + -re ".*in main after func1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
>
> Sorry for not a complete review but for this case there should be:
>
> -re ".*in main after func1.*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
>
> or lib/gdb.exp proc gdb_test is using:
>
> -re ".*in main after func1.*[\r\n]+$gdb_prompt $" {
>
> as just "$gdb_prompt $" is needlessly weak in practical cases causing false
> positives.
Thanks for the review -- but I don't follow you.
What is it about this particular case that you think requires
disambiguating? Or are you saying this in general?
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list