[MI tracepoints 2/9] unify breakpoint commands and tracepoint actions
Pedro Alves
pedro@codesourcery.com
Tue Mar 16 00:56:00 GMT 2010
Is this the final patch? I ask because I'm seeing some of the same
issues that I pointed out before offlist.
On Sunday 14 March 2010 08:47:33, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> + /** We need to verify that each top-level element of commands
> + is valid for tracepoints, that there's at most one while-stepping
> +#gdb_test "info tracepoints" \
> +# "Num Type\[ \]+Disp Enb Address\[ \]+What.*
> +#.*while-stepping $stepcount.*" \
> +
> +
> +
Please also fix this:
> @@ -252,6 +252,8 @@ mi_cmd_break_commands (char *command, char **argv, int argc)
> int bnum;
> struct breakpoint *b;
>
> + extern void check_tracepoint_command (char *line, void *closure);
This is not a review.
--
Pedro Alves
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list