Patch: implement new dynamic varobj spec

Eli Zaretskii eliz@gnu.org
Fri Sep 11 20:49:00 GMT 2009


> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:40:23 -0600
> 
> Nick> Existing documentation uses @var for field names, while new uses @samp.
> 
> Yeah.  @var seems clearly wrong there.
> I will change the new code though.

What part of the patch does this refer to?  I didn't yet read the
patch carefully, but just skimming it I don't see any wrong @var.
Please be more specific.



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list