[PATCH] Fix cygwin build error with i386-linux-tdep.c

[Hui Zhu]

Hi guys,

What do you think about this patch?

Hui

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:15, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 05:15, Joel Brobecker<brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>>> I could suggest casting it to (unsigned int), but it wouldn't
>>> really make any difference, would it?  Mark -- Jiang -- would
>>> that make you guys more comfortable?
>>
>> Short term, I'd rather see us read the syscall number as a signed
>> number since this is what record_linux_system_call expects. We can
>> decide whether to rationalize as a signed or unsigned as a separate
>> patch. I think Mark was OK with the patch I sent yesterday, except
>> that he said we should add a check against negative values.
>>
>> There is also a cast that is unnecessary in the error message.
>> Hui can use %s/paddress rather than %d/cast.
>>
>> --
>> Joel
>>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I make a new patch according to your comment.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
>
> 2009-09-06  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@vmware.com>
>            Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
>            Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>
>        * i386-linux-tdep.c (i386_linux_intx80_sysenter_record): Change
>        regcache_raw_read to regcache_raw_read_signed.
>
> Index: i386-linux-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-linux-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.66
> diff -u -p -r1.66 i386-linux-tdep.c
> --- i386-linux-tdep.c   10 Aug 2009 03:04:44 -0000      1.66
> +++ i386-linux-tdep.c   6 Sep 2009 02:12:15 -0000
> @@ -367,18 +367,19 @@ static int
>  i386_linux_intx80_sysenter_record (struct regcache *regcache)
>  {
>   int ret;
> -  uint32_t tmpu32;
> +  LONGEST syscall;
>
> -  regcache_raw_read (regcache, I386_EAX_REGNUM, (gdb_byte *) &tmpu32);
> +  regcache_raw_read_signed (regcache, I386_EAX_REGNUM, &syscall);
>
> -  if (tmpu32 > 499)
> +  if (syscall < 0 || syscall > 499)
>     {
>       printf_unfiltered (_("Process record and replay target doesn't "
> -                           "support syscall number %u\n"), tmpu32);
> +                           "support syscall number %s\n"),
> +                        plongest (syscall));
>       return -1;
>     }
>
> -  ret = record_linux_system_call (tmpu32, regcache,
> +  ret = record_linux_system_call (syscall, regcache,
>                                  &i386_linux_record_tdep);
>   if (ret)
>     return ret;
>