GDB MI Reverse Commands added [3 of 3]
Jakob Engblom
jakob@virtutech.com
Thu Sep 3 18:44:00 GMT 2009
> The file should be called mi-reverse.exp, I think, because mi2- files are
> supposed to test
> that whatever was once announced as MI2 is not broken. And this is new
> development. Likewise,
Done.
> set MIFLAGS "-i=mi2"
>
> should be:
>
> set MIFLAGS "-i=mi"
Done.
> Also, I would appreciate if this:
>
> # Test exec-reverse-next
> # FIXME: Why does it take 2 next commands to get back to the
> # previous line?
>
> were somehow addressed. I am not familiar with details of reverse behaviour,
so I
> did not even try to check that the tested commands and locations, etc, are
right.
Since this is tested on top of process record, I think I am not the best person
to answer... but in general, what tends to happen in reverse in my experience is
this:
We have lines of code (or instructions)
A
B
And we stop with a breakpoint in line B.
We are then at the end of B, or in the middle of B, in the execution.
Then, doing reverse one step/instruction/line will move you to the start of B.
And another step/instruction/line moves you to before A was executed.
Does that make sense for process record?
/jakob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mi-reverse.exp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5927 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20090903/fbc3b06a/attachment.obj>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list