[RFA] Expand "info record"
Michael Snyder
msnyder@vmware.com
Wed Oct 21 01:38:00 GMT 2009
Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 October 2009 23:25:30, Michael Snyder wrote:
>
>>>> + /* Display instruction number for last instruction in the log. */
>>>> + printf_filtered (_("Highest recorded instruction number is %llu.\n"),
>>>> + record_insn_count ? record_insn_count - 1 : 0);
>>> Why the conditional subtraction?
>> Because I don't want it to say "-1".
>
> Okay, that much is obvious, but how can you reach here
> with record_insn_count == 0, given that you check if you
> have a log at all a bit above?
Maybe not -- but I'm a belt-and-suspenders guy.
I don't believe in not checking for something just because
it "can't happen". What if somebody changed the check above?
[...]
>
> Can't we explicitly say that we're in recording/live vs replay
> mode, or something?
Yeah, you've convinced me. Thanks for the prodding,
and please see new revision. I'll make that conditional
go away too. ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: info4.txt
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20091021/e3e6c7d8/attachment.txt>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list