On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:52:35AM -0700, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > If 'set disassemble-next-line on' worked as Daniel proposed, that would > significantly reduce the need for 'disas/l', I think. For my two cents, I'd rather have both... consider x/i $pc and display/i $pc. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery