fileio test

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:55:16AM +0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> It's not obvious to me how the testsuite could distinguish between
> these two cases.  remote-fileio.c doesn't have any verbose logging we
> could turn on (and have the testsuite watch for it).  I suppose we
> could add it.  Or we could turn on remote-protocol logging and watch
> for that (which seems less desirable).
> 
> Thoughts?

I'm not sure either.  I like the idea of adding logging to
remote-fileio.c; we could use that to disable the test if not using
semihosting.  (Although that risks turning this to UNSUPPORTED if
semihosting is completely broken...)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery