Move the multi-forks support to the generic multi-inferiors support.

[Doug Evans]

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> I guess "info inferiors" would show all the checkpointed forks for a
>> given inferior?
>
> That's one option, sure.  I haven't given much attention to user
> interface details of checkpoints.  Another idea we be to just flag that
> there are checkpoints available, and then the user can do the usual
> "info checkpoints" to see them.  This avoids having a too crowded
> "info inferiors" output.

Other targets (e.g. simulators) may have checkpoints that have nothing
to do with multiple inferiors, so fwiw I think they should be kept
separate.