[RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error

[Hui Zhu]

PING

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 14:00, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I try this issue with cvs-head.  It still affect cvs-head.
> And I try the patch, it can fix this issue.  It's time close to 7.0
> branch.  So could you please help me review it?
>
> The attachment is the new patch follow cvs-head.
>
> 2009-05-06  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>
>       * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior step if it
>       stepping over a function call in reverse , and stop at the
>       start address of the function.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 17:00, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> This patch is for bug in http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-01/msg00146.html
>>
>> This issue is because sometime the inferior is already in function
>> start address (i.e. plt), set a breakpoint and continue will make
>> "reverse-next" work error.
>>
>> This patch make inferior step if it reverse step and stop at the
>> function start address.
>> It tested OK with process record patch and testsuite gdb.twreverse in
>> branch reverse-20081226-branch.
>>
>> 2009-01-22  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>>
>>        * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior step if it
>>        stepping over a function call in reverse , and stop at the
>>        start address of the function.
>>
>> OK for mainline?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>