[RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error
Hui Zhu
teawater@gmail.com
Wed May 6 05:31:00 GMT 2009
Hi Marc,
I cannot reproduce this issue with cvs-head.
Could you please help me test with this issue?
If both of us cannot reproduce this issue, I think I can give up this patch.
Thanks,
Hui
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 14:10, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> This patch is for bug in
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00246.html.
>
> The reason of bug is when inferior reverse exection into dynsym
> resolve code, gdb doesn't insert breakpoint in right address.
> It just happen in some distributions for example SLED.
>
> This patch make gdb insert breakpoint in right address or step in that case.
>
> 2008-03-02 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>
> * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior insert
> breakpoint at right address or step in reverse and it stepped
> into dynsym resolve code.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list