[RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 0/8

[Marc Khouzam]

> Could you send me the bugs that you got?  If it just can reproduce in
> Eclipse, I will try it.
> 
> About these bugs, I think we need deal with them one by one and step
> by step like before.  :)

I was suggesting using Eclipse, because it takes me time to isolate a bug
and reproduce it in a smaller, command-line example.
But when I have a little time, I will send whatever I find

Marc

> 
> Thanks,
> Hui
> 
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 23:28, Marc Khouzam 
> <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > I see.  I've only tried reverse with your patches so I don't know
> > if the bugs I see also show up when using vmware, simics or 
> gdbreplay...
> > But if those bugs are already in HEAD, it would be good if we could
> > get them fixed before 7.0.
> >
> > If anyone wants to try reverse with Eclipse to do more 
> thourough testing,
> > I'll help.
> >
> > Marc
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
> >> [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Hui Zhu
> >> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:17 AM
> >> To: Marc Khouzam
> >> Cc: Pedro Alves; Michael Snyder; Thiago Jung Bauermann; Eli
> >> Zaretskii; Mark Kettenis; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >> Subject: Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth 
> time, 0/8
> >>
> >> Hi Marc,
> >>
> >> I think most of issue that you got is about the reverse 
> debug control
> >> part.  This is not in the p record patches.  The reverse 
> debug include
> >> reverse debug control part already in cvs-head.
> >> For example, the 3 bugs that you sent to maillist are all 
> for reverse
> >> debug control part. But not for p record.
> >>
> >> Process record just a target that support reverse debug 
> function.  It
> >> depend on reverse debug function.
> >> Actually, process record target was designed and developed together
> >> with reverse debug (Michael and me).
> >>
> >> And I think this is a good reason for let process record in now.
> >> Reverse debug function had already checked in cvs-head a 
> lot of month.
> >>  It will have a lot of customers after 7.0 release.  I 
> think it need a
> >> big and clear test.
> >> Now, remote target support reverse debug in cvs-head.  The 
> gdb stubs
> >> support it are vmware, simics and gdbreplay.
> >> So, just process record can use reverse debug in host 
> directly.  And
> >> there is a testsuite for reverse debug and process record called
> >> gdb.twreverse (This a temp name) in branch reverse-20081226-branch.
> >> It can be very easy to porting to cvs-head.  And we can 
> add more test
> >> (include for MI and eclipse) to increase the testsuit, p record and
> >> reverse debug.
> >>
> >> So, I think let process record in can help move forward.  :)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Hui
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 21:50, Marc Khouzam
> >> <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi Hui,
> >> >
> >> > as you know, I am a big fan of your RecordAndReplay enhancements.
> >> > In fact, I just demoed it at EclipseCon to show how we can
> >> do Reverse
> >> > Debugging in the CDT.  People were very very interested!
> >> >
> >> > However, I think there are still a few bugs.  These bugs 
> may be hard
> >> > to notice when working from the command line, but when
> >> working in Eclipse
> >> > they can be seen easily.  Those bugs are mostly unexpected
> >> behavior such
> >> > as jumping too far backwards.  They also happen more easily
> >> when using
> >> > a program that has a bit of complexity.  For example, 
> the recursive
> >> > bug that I found last week.
> >> >
> >> > Do you have access to eclipse?  We can work together to 
> have you try
> >> > the reverse debugging that I added to CDT, so that you 
> can work with
> >> > your patches more intensely and test them even better.
> >> >
> >> > I would really like to see your patches in GDB 7.0, so 
> maybe using
> >> > Eclipse to test it can help move forward.  What do you think?
> >> >
> >> > Marc
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Hui Zhu [mailto:teawater@gmail.com]
> >> >> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 1:34 AM
> >> >> To: Pedro Alves; Marc Khouzam; Michael Snyder; Thiago Jung
> >> >> Bauermann; Eli Zaretskii; Mark Kettenis
> >> >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >> >> Subject: Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth
> >> time, 0/8
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi guys,
> >> >>
> >> >> I am not sure your are reviewing the p record patches or done.
> >> >>
> >> >> Do you think all of them are ok to in?  :)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Hui
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 23:58, Hui Zhu 
> <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi guys,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > After third time submit, there are a lot of change with
> >> >> process record
> >> >> > and replay.  So I submit fourth time to make it clear 
> to review.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > For this time, Most of changes were updated follow cvs head
> >> >> and a lot
> >> >> > of format fixes.  Patch for target.c was removed.  
> Record.c was
> >> >> > updated a lot of parts according to the ideas of Pedro (Much
> >> >> > appreciated).
> >> >> > Thanks for help of everybody in the maillist.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Process record and replay make gdb can record inferior
> >> >> execute log and
> >> >> > replay (include reverse debug).
> >> >> > Now, it support I386-Linux single-thread inferior 
> native debug.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I've divided this patch into eight sections, for ease 
> of review.
> >> >> > They group as:
> >> >> > 1) Architecture support layer (gdbarch.sh, gdbarch.c, 
> gbarch.h).
> >> >> > 2) New stratum of strata in target layer (target.h).
> >> >> > 3) Process record and replay target (record.c, record.h,
> >> >> Makefile.in).
> >> >> > 4) Process record and replay for Linux (linux-record.c,
> >> >> > linux-record.h, Makefile.in, configure.tgt).
> >> >> > 5) Event handling (infrun.c).
> >> >> > 6) Intel 386 target-dependent stuff (i386-tdep.c, 
> i386-tdep.h).
> >> >> > 7) Target-dependent code for GNU/Linux i386 
> (i386-linux-tdep.c).
> >> >> > 8) User interface and documentation.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > For the NEWS:
> >> >> > * Process record and replay
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  In a architecture environment that supports 
> ``process record and
> >> >> >  replay'', ``process record and replay'' target can
> >> record a log of
> >> >> >  the process execution, and replay it with both forward
> >> and reverse
> >> >> >  execute commands.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > These patches be tested with testsuite gdb.twreverse in branch
> >> >> > reverse-20081226-branch.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Attachment is the compressed patches package to make get
> >> >> all patches easy.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > Hui
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>