more missing gplv3 notices

[Pedro Alves]

On Wednesday 18 March 2009 16:12:37, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> I was refering to the quoted ChangeLog message.
> 

Eh, hmmm, ah, oh.  You found an example of a bad example.

Still on the can or worms channel, I've been through some
similar renaming a couple of days ago:

 http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-03/msg00324.html

... and I can attest that it is painful to write such
spelled out changelogs, so I can understand if one wants
to short circuit it --- yet I'd done it exactly for
"grepability".  I hope it is clear that this is a different
case from Nathan's log.

-- 
Pedro Alves