[rfc] python API exposing inferior's frame stack.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:01:23 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> +@tindex gdb.Frame
> >> +@tindex Frame
> 
> Eli> Please don't use @tindex, we don't use such an index in the GDB
> Eli> manual.
> 
> Now that we have documentation describing types, it seems like we
> ought to add a type index.

What's wrong with having them documented in the main index?  We can
always have something like

  @cindex @code{Foo}, a data type

More than one index in a manual complicates looking up things, and I
don't feel the number of types we have in GDB, or will have in the
near future, justifies this inconveniency.  But I'm open to arguments
to the contrary.