some missing gplv3 notices

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Thu Mar 12 16:32:00 GMT 2009


On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:24:27PM +0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> A customer noticed that some of the gdbserver files were still gplv2 or 
> later, and asked some questions.
>
> AFAICT this is just a slip up and there is no need for these to be stuck 
> at gplv2 -- it certainly doesn't change gdbserver from being gplv3.
>
> This patch changes those files to be gplv3 or later, ok?

OK.  You're right - gdbserver is definitely v3 now.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list