some missing gplv3 notices
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Thu Mar 12 16:32:00 GMT 2009
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:24:27PM +0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> A customer noticed that some of the gdbserver files were still gplv2 or
> later, and asked some questions.
>
> AFAICT this is just a slip up and there is no need for these to be stuck
> at gplv2 -- it certainly doesn't change gdbserver from being gplv3.
>
> This patch changes those files to be gplv3 or later, ok?
OK. You're right - gdbserver is definitely v3 now.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list