[PING] [RFC-v2] Use untested for macscp.exp if no macro information generated

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr> writes:

Pierre> I didn't get any feedback on this one.

Sorry about that.

Pierre> Should I resend it as a RFA?

No need :)

>> FAIL: gdb.base/macscp.exp: info macro WHERE after `list main'
>> (undefined)

It seems to me that it should be possible to check some macro
expansion without running a "test", and thus not having any FAILs show
up in the log.

Is this too hard?

E.g., I was thinking, send "macro expand FIFTY_SEVEN", and if you
don't get "= 57" back, call untested and return.

Tom