RFC: %ebp-based backtrace patch
Sun Dec 27 16:59:00 GMT 2009
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:53:30AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:01:16AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Before comitting this diff, I ran the testsuite, and noticed a
> > regression. The problem is that if you do a function call through a
> > null-function-pointer or an otherwise corrupt function pointer, and
> > get a SIGSEGV, the backtrace no longer shows the frame that did the
> > function call.
> > Until we come up with a way to fix this issue, I'm not going to commit
> > the diff.
> Hmm. if (target_read_memory (pc, buf, 1)) ? That's how a similar
> issue is handled on ARM, in arm_stub_unwind_sniffer.
I was looking through Ubuntu's local GDB patches and noticed this one
is still outstanding. Will the above work? I can test and
(hopefully) commit it, if you'd like.
More information about the Gdb-patches