[RFA] 64-bit range types in GDB
Pierre Muller
pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr
Sat Dec 5 16:53:00 GMT 2009
> > Paul> + _("Suspicious DW_AT_byte_size value treated as zero
> instead of 0x%llx"),
> > Paul> + (long long) DW_UNSND (attr));
> >
> > Are %ll and `long long' really portable? I think you need something
> > else here. There are a few cases.
You shouldn't use %ll
as this would degenerate ARI regressions.
Please use %s with plongest or pulongest functions
from utils.c
Otherwise, I really like the idea of your patch to
remove the 32bit limitation for ranges!
Pierre Muller
as ARI "maintainer"...
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list