Bug in i386_process_record?
Eli Zaretskii
eliz@gnu.org
Mon Aug 24 20:31:00 GMT 2009
> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:42:41 +0800
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> For the gdb, the value of segment reg is not the really value.
> cs 0x73 115
> ss 0x7b 123
> ds 0x7b 123
> es 0x7b 123
> fs 0x0 0
> gs 0x33 51
> I have tried some insn that use segment reg such as string ops insn.
> I found that the value of this segment reg cannot affect anything.
Did you try setjmp and longjmp?
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list