Bug in i386_process_record?

Eli Zaretskii eliz@gnu.org
Mon Aug 24 20:31:00 GMT 2009


> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:42:41 +0800
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> For the gdb, the value of segment reg is not the really value.
> cs             0x73	115
> ss             0x7b	123
> ds             0x7b	123
> es             0x7b	123
> fs             0x0	0
> gs             0x33	51
> I have tried some insn that use segment reg such as string ops insn.
> I found that the value of this segment reg cannot affect anything.

Did you try setjmp and longjmp?



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list