[PATCH] obvious pattern fix in gdb.base/step-line.exp

[Christophe LYON]

On 01.04.2009 20:32, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> But I am not 100% sure how to interpret the ANSI C spec regarding the  
>> #line directive: when the name of the source file has no path (as in  
>> step-line.c, where #line xx "step-line.c" is used), which path should be  
>> considered?
> 
> Not sure either. Perhaps it's just unspecified?
> 
I would say so, too.


> I'm OK with leaving the testcase untouched if we don't need to.
OK. So I won't commit my patch, and fix the compiler instead.

Thanks
Christophe.