[RFA] gdb_continue_to_breakpoint

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 02:26:17PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Yabbut, this isn't a test of symbol handling, it's
> a test of continuing to a breakpoint.

True, though we have a lot of things that are tested 'all over' like
this.

>> For the second part can you just put the .* at
>> appropriate callers?
>
> Sure, if you prefer.  So maybe remove the .* but accept
> the (in|at)?

Yes please.  That part seems fine - it's not like nothing else will
break if we end up unexpectedly without debug info :-).

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery