[RFA] Resubmit, reverse debugging [0/5]

[Michael Snyder]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:16:23AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>> We also discussed earlier the idea of a capability check,
>> or like a qSupported message.  Are we going to make that a
>> requirement before this patch can go in?  Or can it be added
>> as a subsequent, incremental improvement?
> 
> I don't have an opinion either way.
> 
>> And are there any more requirements before this patch can go in?
> 
> If Pedro has no further comments - he had several before - then it
> should be fine.  I don't know what "this patch" covers, though, so
> it's hard to be sure.

Pedro?  Did I address your concerns, and/or are the remaining
ones addressable incrementally?