[RFA] Resubmit, reverse debugging [0/5]

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:16:23AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> We also discussed earlier the idea of a capability check,
> or like a qSupported message.  Are we going to make that a
> requirement before this patch can go in?  Or can it be added
> as a subsequent, incremental improvement?

I don't have an opinion either way.

> And are there any more requirements before this patch can go in?

If Pedro has no further comments - he had several before - then it
should be fine.  I don't know what "this patch" covers, though, so
it's hard to be sure.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery