GDB record patch 0.1.3.1 for GDB-6.8 release

[Thiago Jung Bauermann]

On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 11:10 -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> If you want to improve on that a little bit more, you might
> say "If you change the machine state in the middle of a 
> replay, I will throw away all of the recorded state *forward*
> of that point, but keep the recorded state going *back* from 
> there.  You can't go back into what used to be the "future"
> because by changing the past, you have now destroyed that
> particular future.  But you can still go further into the
> past.

Right. And that's very easy to implement right? Just throw away the
recorded entries "in the future". Or am I being to naïve?
-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center