[rfc][3/3] Eliminate LOC_BASEREG and LOC_BASEREG_ARG

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:53:28PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Removing this also allows us to get rid of the basereg member of the
> aux_value union in struct symbol.  (At which point there is only one
> member of the union remaining.  Should we remove the union?)

IMO, yes.  The remaining union member is probably good for any new
types also.

> Any objections to removing those address classes?

Not from me.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery