[rfc] Relax "printf" function name check in annota* test cases

[Ulrich Weigand]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:45:50AM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > B.t.w. even if we were to handle versioned symbols (I have a patch
> > for that), the original annota test cases would still break -- 
> > because the function would then be called printf@GLIBC...
> 
> Ok, thanks.  This patch sounds like the right thing to me then!

Thanks, I've checked it in now.

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com