[rfc] Relax "printf" function name check in annota* test cases

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:45:50AM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> B.t.w. even if we were to handle versioned symbols (I have a patch
> for that), the original annota test cases would still break -- 
> because the function would then be called printf@GLIBC...

Ok, thanks.  This patch sounds like the right thing to me then!

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery