Pending breakpoints

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:14:23AM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote:
>    (gdb) nosharedlibrary 
>    (gdb) info break
>    Num     Type           Disp Enb  Address    What
>    1       breakpoint     keep y    <PENDING>  
> 
> and the last "info break" no longer says what the breakpoint is for.  I don't
> really know when you would unload the shared library, in practice, but I think
> this line should look like the first output from "info break", i.e., include
> sqrt.

I agree that this is wrong.

> The patch below does that.  It's a bit of a guess, though, and I've not run
> the testuite.

Seems good to me.  We do the same in print_one_breakpoint_location.
The patch is OK with a changelog and a full test run.

Even better would be to discard locations when we shlib_disable a
breakpoint, and get rid of the shlib_disable flag.  But doing that may
require that we get rid of shared libraries when we're supposed to.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery